From 4d4b2b5d3a7b41cd25320df7d3765441dc8be1f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Gauthier Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 23:04:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] philosophy - an obituary --- content/post/philosophy-an-obituary.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/post/philosophy-an-obituary.md b/content/post/philosophy-an-obituary.md index 991e894..bd30f4d 100644 --- a/content/post/philosophy-an-obituary.md +++ b/content/post/philosophy-an-obituary.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ date: 2015-11-14T21:47:53Z tags: ["stephen hawking"] topics: ["philosophy", "psychology", "culture"] image: /img/philosophy-obituary.jpg -draft: true +draft: false --- Last night, I {{< newtab title="watched a debate" url="http://iai.tv/video/hawking-vs-philosophy" >}} between a journalist, a sociologist, and a scientist over whether or not philosophy is “dead” (as Stephen Hawking put it). Lewis Wolpert completely wiped the floor with the non-philosophers pitted against him. And sadly, he was also mostly correct. Philosophy has not done itself proud of late, and the fact that this panel didn’t actually include any philosophers to stand in its defense, is evidence that it is struggling, if not dead.