- Restrict topics in CLAUDE.md to: philosophy, craft, epistemology, exploratory-testing, agile - Update GROK.md YAML examples for title quotes and related file extensions - Adjust topics in published articles to align with controlled list, removing deprecated terms like bdd, automation, reasoning, formal-logic, resources
5.0 KiB
5.0 KiB
CLAUDE.md
What This Repository Is
This is a personal blog of long-form articles written by Gregory Gauthier, a software tester and automation engineer. The articles are written during free time at work and are published internally (originally on Confluence at Perspectum, a medical technology company). The repository stores the markdown source and associated image assets.
Writing Style and Voice
Gregory's articles have a distinctive style that Claude should understand and respect, but never attempt to replicate wholesale. The voice is his own. Key characteristics:
- Philosophical grounding: Articles regularly draw on formal philosophy — Aristotle (telos, phronesis, hexis, techne), epistemology, formal logic (modus ponens, modus tollens), and philosophy of science. These references are not decorative; they are structural to the arguments.
- Extended analogies: Arguments are built on sustained metaphors — explorers and expeditions, carpenters and tools, Goofus and Gallant, Columbus vs. Lewis and Clark. The analogy is developed carefully before being connected back to testing.
- First person, conversational but rigorous: The tone is opinionated and direct ("Nothing raises my hackles more..."), self-deprecating where appropriate ("Before I puff myself up too much..."), and intellectually honest about counterarguments.
- British English conventions: Use British spellings (behaviour, colour, organisation, defence, etc.).
- Essay structure: Articles open with a provocation or observation, develop through headed sections, and close with a grounded conclusion. They do not end with generic summary paragraphs or calls to action.
- Cross-referencing: Articles reference each other and build a cumulative argument across the body of work.
How Claude Can Help
Brainstorming and Ideation
- Suggest connections between testing concepts and ideas from other disciplines (philosophy, science, history, mathematics) that could seed new articles.
- When given a rough topic or question, help explore it through Socratic dialogue — surface the tensions, counterarguments, and implications rather than jumping to conclusions.
- Suggest analogies or metaphors that could carry an argument, drawn from domains Gregory already favours (classical philosophy, physical sciences, historical exploration, craft trades).
Research Assistance
- Look up and summarise academic or technical sources relevant to a topic under exploration.
- Verify claims, quotations, and attributions before they go into a draft.
- Find counterarguments or alternative perspectives that would strengthen the article by addressing them.
Drafting Support
- Help expand outline notes (like those in
articles/drafts/) into fuller prose, but always as raw material for Gregory to rewrite in his own voice — never as finished text to publish directly. - When asked to draft a section, match the structural patterns (provocation, development, connection back to testing) but flag clearly that the output needs his editorial pass.
- Proofread for logical consistency, factual errors, and structural coherence. Do not "fix" stylistic choices or voice.
What Claude Should NOT Do
- Do not generate complete articles and present them as ready to publish. Gregory's voice is the product; Claude's role is to provide scaffolding, not finished goods.
- Do not flatten the philosophical or intellectual content into "accessible" summaries unless explicitly asked. The audience is technical colleagues who can handle the complexity.
- Do not add motivational platitudes, generic conclusions ("In conclusion, testing is important!"), or marketing-style calls to action.
- Do not suggest topics that are purely trend-chasing (e.g., "Top 10 AI Testing Tools in 2026"). The blog is reflective and argumentative, not listicle-driven.
- Do not sanitise opinions. The articles take positions and defend them. Hedging everything into bland neutrality defeats the purpose.
Repository Conventions
- Published articles go in
articles/published/ - Work-in-progress goes in
articles/drafts/ - Images and assets are organised by type under
assets/(clipart, general, memes) - Articles are written in Markdown with inline image references and hyperlinks
Front-matter Schema
All published articles carry YAML front-matter:
---
title: "Article Title"
date: YYYY-MM-DD # original publication date
topics: [topic-a, topic-b]
related:
- other-article.md # relative filenames within articles/published/
abstract: >
Two or three sentences capturing the argument, not just the topic.
---
- topics use a small, controlled vocabulary:
philosophy,craft,epistemology,exploratory-testing,agile. Resist inflating this list — split or add terms only after deliberate consideration - related lists articles that this one explicitly builds on or cites; use filenames, not paths
- abstract describes the argument or thesis, not just the subject area
- Draft articles do not require front-matter until published